<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to feature-requests</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mfstools/feature-requests/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mfstools/feature-requests/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/mfstools/feature-requests/</id><updated>2007-03-25T15:49:31Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to feature-requests</subtitle><entry><title>disable dirve scanning</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mfstools/feature-requests/8/" rel="alternate"/><published>2007-03-25T15:49:31Z</published><updated>2007-03-25T15:49:31Z</updated><author><name>Scott Schubert</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/scottonaharley/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net9de405788f596c81a460ab0e1704bfc4d863d149</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;When copying large drives it would be desireable to disable the pre copy scan that takes place in mfsbackup.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Add support for alternative mass storage devices</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mfstools/feature-requests/7/" rel="alternate"/><published>2006-05-22T16:06:46Z</published><updated>2006-05-22T16:06:46Z</updated><author><name>Anonymous</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/userid-None/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net380271a735c10151f864731144ef310061adf596</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Many new (tier 1) systems based on the latest Intel &lt;br /&gt;
chipsets do not include two IDE channels.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Ex., the Dell Dimension 91x0 / XPS 400 series with &lt;br /&gt;
the i945 chipset only has one IDE channel and does not &lt;br /&gt;
support two UDMA mode 4/5/6 devices concurrently on &lt;br /&gt;
the master and slave, limiting the IDE expansion to &lt;br /&gt;
one HD at UDMA 4/5/6 and one boot CD at UDMA-2)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It would be of great convenience if the MFSTools boot &lt;br /&gt;
CD were to add support for alternative HD controllers &lt;br /&gt;
if for nothing else than to read/write backup images &lt;br /&gt;
from/to.  Added support for a variety of PCI IDE &lt;br /&gt;
controllers would definitely be a plus, as would &lt;br /&gt;
support for USB and Firewire drives and SATA &lt;br /&gt;
controllers as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have found that an old Promise IDE controller I have &lt;br /&gt;
actually works with the boot CD, but a newer PCI IDE &lt;br /&gt;
controller based on a Silicon Image chipset does not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Port to TIvo</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mfstools/feature-requests/6/" rel="alternate"/><published>2005-08-11T04:46:43Z</published><updated>2005-08-11T04:46:43Z</updated><author><name>Don Beusee</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/dbeusee/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net7bc6768fa6657673f23760953b27c27ed2db5ee3</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It would be best if we can do the backups right on the Tivo &lt;br /&gt;
unit itself and avoid the most inconvenient disk drive &lt;br /&gt;
shuffle.  We could then back up to nfs-mounted or samba-&lt;br /&gt;
mounted drive or ftp the backup ourselves to the file server &lt;br /&gt;
of our choice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Test backup</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mfstools/feature-requests/5/" rel="alternate"/><published>2004-10-17T07:38:26Z</published><updated>2004-10-17T07:38:26Z</updated><author><name>xpanmanx</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/xpanmanx/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netede35309ee7d2182ee7c89126aeea6400bbf3a3c</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The ability to test a backup image for compression &lt;br /&gt;
integrity **without** overwriting a hard disk, would be &lt;br /&gt;
most appreciated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>kernel 2.6.x for ntfs write</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mfstools/feature-requests/4/" rel="alternate"/><published>2004-06-17T19:54:28Z</published><updated>2004-06-17T19:54:28Z</updated><author><name>Brian Engert</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/lart2150/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netd88b95009d60120651fb9a8a85d8c9fe7440568e</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;kernel 2.6.x has native support for writeing to ntfs&lt;br /&gt;
drives.  this would help a lot of people who have&lt;br /&gt;
windows 2k/xp&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Ability to divorce without the B drive</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mfstools/feature-requests/3/" rel="alternate"/><published>2004-03-12T11:54:54Z</published><updated>2004-03-12T11:54:54Z</updated><author><name>Steven Lang</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/tiger/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.netd390795f546b95d3cf8463cb817f7c8748d1a0bf</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Often there are cases where a drive can be divorced &lt;br /&gt;
without the B drive being present.  Such cases would be &lt;br /&gt;
simple upgrades that just involved adding a drive.  There &lt;br /&gt;
is enough data on the first drive, since the list of blocks &lt;br /&gt;
to backup comes from the application partition.  Some &lt;br /&gt;
detection would be needed that there wasn't an &lt;br /&gt;
application partition on the missing drive, but besides &lt;br /&gt;
that, there should be no issues. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, since the limitation comes from the MFS library &lt;br /&gt;
and not from the backup tool, this may not be such an &lt;br /&gt;
easy fix. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>MacOS-X support</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mfstools/feature-requests/2/" rel="alternate"/><published>2004-03-12T11:11:56Z</published><updated>2004-03-12T11:11:56Z</updated><author><name>Steven Lang</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/tiger/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net87f6f1e0a8a685e68a1e9ec0434daf91546d7666</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The most commonly requested platform to support is &lt;br /&gt;
MacOS-X.  It should be fairly straight forward of a port, &lt;br /&gt;
at least for a console application.  A graphical interface &lt;br /&gt;
would be a little bit more. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry><entry><title>Graphical interface (X11/etc)</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/mfstools/feature-requests/1/" rel="alternate"/><published>2004-03-12T05:05:29Z</published><updated>2004-03-12T05:05:29Z</updated><author><name>Steven Lang</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/tiger/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net47ffda5286fb4da8c7e4184ae31f0381505d98ba</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Right now the interface is not very user friendly.  A &lt;br /&gt;
graphical interface would make this much easier.  Either &lt;br /&gt;
something that runs on something else (Such as X) or a &lt;br /&gt;
standalone GUI.  Something standalone would be best for &lt;br /&gt;
people doing a boot disk.  I believe QT has a standalone &lt;br /&gt;
version as well as an X11 version, so that would be a &lt;br /&gt;
good choic if so. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>