<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to 17: validation value too bad? (ID 40254692)</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/nmrshiftdb2/database-errors/17/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/nmrshiftdb2/database-errors/17/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/nmrshiftdb2/database-errors/17/</id><updated>2019-12-20T08:18:43.656000Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to 17: validation value too bad? (ID 40254692)</subtitle><entry><title>validation value too bad? (ID 40254692)</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/nmrshiftdb2/database-errors/17/" rel="alternate"/><published>2019-12-20T08:18:43.656000Z</published><updated>2019-12-20T08:18:43.656000Z</updated><author><name>Nils Schloerer</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/nes-cgn-nmr/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net4d523031b8ba5ba6b90c71d9a31b3ef31ccc5b4a</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The assignment has been corroborated by 2D experiments, and c.s. prediction for 13C is actually good (not the same for 1H!!!). In contrast, the judgement excellent is accompanied by a very low score (although no significant deviation from prediction is existent)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>