<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Recent changes to 17: validation value too bad? (ID 40254692)</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/nmrshiftdb2/database-errors/17/</link><description>Recent changes to 17: validation value too bad? (ID 40254692)</description><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/nmrshiftdb2/database-errors/17/feed.rss" rel="self"/><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 08:18:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/nmrshiftdb2/database-errors/17/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>validation value too bad? (ID 40254692)</title><link>https://sourceforge.net/p/nmrshiftdb2/database-errors/17/</link><description>&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;The assignment has been corroborated by 2D experiments, and c.s. prediction for 13C is actually good (not the same for 1H!!!). In contrast, the judgement excellent is accompanied by a very low score (although no significant deviation from prediction is existent)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nils Schloerer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 08:18:43 -0000</pubDate><guid>https://sourceforge.net4d523031b8ba5ba6b90c71d9a31b3ef31ccc5b4a</guid></item></channel></rss>