<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><title>Recent changes to 19: poor validation of correct 1h shifts</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/nmrshiftdb2/database-errors/19/" rel="alternate"/><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/nmrshiftdb2/database-errors/19/feed.atom" rel="self"/><id>https://sourceforge.net/p/nmrshiftdb2/database-errors/19/</id><updated>2020-02-05T12:42:31.663000Z</updated><subtitle>Recent changes to 19: poor validation of correct 1h shifts</subtitle><entry><title>poor validation of correct 1h shifts</title><link href="https://sourceforge.net/p/nmrshiftdb2/database-errors/19/" rel="alternate"/><published>2020-02-05T12:42:31.663000Z</published><updated>2020-02-05T12:42:31.663000Z</updated><author><name>Nils Schloerer</name><uri>https://sourceforge.net/u/nes-cgn-nmr/</uri></author><id>https://sourceforge.net37179fa412f2091003dc1c878aaeb4ebb1713944</id><summary type="html">&lt;div class="markdown_content"&gt;&lt;p&gt;For reasonably well predicted 1H chemical shifts, the rating of spectrum id 40254852 is poor&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary></entry></feed>